Nominations Invited for Buncombe County Bar Awards

Deadline Extended: The Executive Committee invites your nomination of members of the Buncombe County to receive the 2021 Centennial, Professionalism, Distinguished Young Lawyer and Lifetime Achievement Awards.

Awards are presented at our annual meeting, which this year is June 9, 2021. The deadline for submitting nominations is Monday, May 17, 2021.

The North Carolina Bar Association Centennial Award honors an individual member of each Judicial District for outstanding service which benefits our local community. Examples of such service include: elected and/or appointed service to local government; civic involvement on boards of community agencies; involvement in public service projects; and volunteer involvement with schools, churches, or other nonprofit organizations. The award is named in honor of the Bar Association’s Centennial (1899-1999).

The Buncombe County Bar Professionalism Award annually recognizes an individual member of our Bar whose consistently courteous, respectful, and professional conduct toward the Court, attorneys, clients, and other parties exemplifies the highest standards of professionalism.

The Distinguished Young Lawyer Award recognizes the contribution to the legal profession and society made by a member of the Buncombe County Bar. To qualify the person must be nominated by a member of the Buncombe County Bar, have been a member of the Bar for less than 10 years; be under 40 years old; and be someone whose contribution to the legal community and society exemplifies high achievement in the legal field along with a dedication to professionalism, ethics and community service.

The Buncombe County Bar Lifetime Achievement Award recognizes extraordinary excellence throughout the career of a member of the legal profession with connections to Buncombe County, as an officer of the legal system and as a public citizen having special responsibility for the quality of justice.  This award is given only when it is obviously apparent that an appropriate individual serves to embody of the very highest ideals of the legal profession.

Nominations should be submitted to Lisa-Gaye Hall, Bar Administrator, at Please supply a statement about your nominee and why you recommend them for the award, and your contact information. We welcome letters of support. Click here to see past award winners. Thank you for helping the Executive Committee to honor deserving members with these significant awards.

Update From Bar Councilor Anna Hamrick

Dear Friends and Colleagues of the Buncombe County Bar –

The Bar Council recently wrapped up its quarterly meeting.  Please note you may watch all the public meetings on the NC State Bar YouTube Channel.

Below are some highlights:

  1. Unless the Governor reverses course on the elimination of COVID restrictions on the size of gatherings (effective June 1), the State Bar Council’s July quarterly meeting will be live in Asheville.  The Renaissance Hotel will be the venue.  I will keep you posted.
  1. The Legislative Committee learned the General Assembly is still working to reconcile the numbers for the prosecutorial districts with the judicial districts, but nothing so far is formally in the works.  I’m not holding my breath.
  1. A bill has been introduced which would give the NCSB the authority to increase bar dues in 2023 by up to $25 and increase late fees from $30 up to $50.  It would permit increases of $25.00 every other year thereafter up to a maximum of $400.00.
  1. Ethics Opinions:
    a. The Council adopted FEO 2021 Formal Ethics Opinion 1, covering contemporaneous residential real estate closings.  The FEO addresses conflicts of interest, communication, funding issues, and accountings in contemporaneous closings for residential real property.
    b. The Ethics Committee is publishing Proposed 2019 Formal Ethics Opinion 4, on communications with judicial officials.  This proposed opinion discusses the permissibility of various types of communications between lawyers and judges.
    c. The Ethics Committee is publishing Proposed 2020 Formal Ethics Opinion 1, covering responding to negative online reviews.  The proposed opinion rules that a lawyer is not permitted to include confidential information in a response to a client’s negative online review but is not barred from responding in a professional and restrained manner.
    d. The Ethics Committee is also publishing Proposed 2021 Formal Ethics Opinion 2, covering a lawyer’s professional responsibility in identifying and avoiding counterfeit checks.  The proposed opinion discusses a lawyer’s professional responsibility to safeguard entrusted funds by identifying and avoiding purported transactions involving counterfeit checks.
    e. The Ethics Committee issued for publication Proposed 2021 Formal Ethics Opinion 3, covering charging fees to the opposing party in residential real estate closing.  The proposed opinion rules that a closing lawyer representing the buyer in a residential real estate transaction may not charge a fee to a separately represented opposing party unless the party consents to the fee and the lawyer complies with Rules 1.5(a) and 1.8(f).
  1. If anyone in our district is interested in submitting a name for consideration to be appointed to any of the boards and/or commissions to which the NCSB makes appointments or nominates lawyers for appointment, please let me know and I will tell you how to go about doing so.  Just to give you some examples of the options, in the last quarterly meeting , the Council appointed persons to serve on the Disciplinary Hearing Commission, the NC Courts Commission, and the Legal Aid of NC Board.  The Council also sent the names of nominees to the Governor for appointment to the Inmate Grievance Resolution Board.
  1. At the Council Meeting, Justice Anita Earls gave a presentation of the Equal Access to Justice Commission’s 2021 NC Civil Legal Needs Assessment.  Our own Robin Merrell, of Pisgah Legal Services, was on the Steering Committee.  Thank you, Robin!

The report notes:

A large percentage of the population in North Carolina cannot afford the services of a private attorney. Each year, thousands of North Carolinians must navigate complex civil legal issues such as foreclosure and child custody without the benefit of representation. As a result, basic human needs like food, safety, shelter, and healthcare go unmet.

In 2020, in partnership with UNC Greensboro’s Center for Housing and Community Studies, the NC Equal Access to Justice Commission (EATJC) and the Equal Justice Alliance (EJA) completed the first comprehensive civil legal needs assessment in nearly two decades. The study provides an overview of the scope of civil legal needs in North Carolina, as well as the factors affecting the depth and type of civil legal problems people experience.

A summary can be found here :

  1. A survey from a subcommittee on the compensation paid to court-appointed defense counsel will be sent to a pilot group of board-certified criminal defense attorneys.  The survey asks questions about workload and pay.  Once any problems with the survey are worked-out with the pilot group, the survey will be sent to all active members of the State Bar.  Information from the survey will be compiled and provided to Indigent Defense Services, AOC, and other entities that may advocate for changes in compensation rates for court-appointed attorneys.
  2. Proposed Rule Amendments Recommended for Publication:
    a. Amendment to Preamble of the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct –Inclusion of Anti-Discrimination Language.  It reads:  ___________

Rule 0.1, Preamble: A Lawyer’s Responsibilities; paragraph (f) [NEW]

(f) The North Carolina Constitution requires that “right and justice shall be administered without favor, denial, or delay.” Public confidence in the justice system is strengthened when all participants are treated equally, fairly, honestly, and respectfully within the system. A lawyer, as a representative of and crucial contributor to the justice system, should foster public confidence in the administration of justice by treating all persons the lawyer encounters in a professional capacity equally, courteously, respectfully, and with dignity regardless of a person’s race, sex, national origin, religion, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, or socioeconomic status.

b. Amendment to Comment to Rule 1.1 (Competency) – Awareness of Implicit Bias and Cultural Differences.  It reads:  __________

Rule 1.1, Competence; Comment [9] [NEW]

A lawyer shall not handle a legal matter that the lawyer knows or should know he or she is not competent to handle without associating with a lawyer who is competent to handle the matter. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.


. . .

Maintaining Competence

. . .

[9] Competency includes a lawyer’s awareness of implicit bias and cultural differences relative to a client or anyone involved in a client’s matter that might affect the lawyer’s representation of the client.  This is to ensure understanding of the client’s needs, effective communication with the client and others, and adequate representation of the client.

  1. The Council voted to recommend to the Supreme Court approval of rules amendments that add 1 hour of CLE for 2022 for education on implicit bias, diversity, and inclusion. (The total number of required CLE hours—12—will remain the same.)
  1. Proposed amendments to the rule on reinstatement after loss of one’s law license were approved for publication.  The amendments  clarify that a petitioner for reinstatement more than 7 years after the date of suspension must pass the Uniform Bar Exam, the North Carolina state-specific component of the bar exam,  and the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam no more than nine months before filing the petition.
  1. Some statistics:
    a. Attorney Client Assistance Program:

During the first quarter of 2021, ACAP staff responded to 1,149 phone calls from members of the public and placed 246 calls to lawyers in an effort to resolve their concerns. Staff also responded to 1,387 emails from members of the public and from attorneys and responded to 495 letters from inmates. The State Bar opened 81 requests for fee dispute resolution during the first quarter, all of which were assigned to the two State Bar facilitators.

b. Grievances:

In 2016, 1,375 grievance files were opened. In 2017, 1,305 grievance files were opened. In 2018,

1,247 grievance files were opened. In 2019, 1,254 grievance files were opened. In 2020, 927 grievance were opened. As of April 8, 269 grievance files had been opened.  As of April 8, 1,210 grievances were pending. One hundred sixty-nine grievances were stayed.  Forty-two pending files were in the judicial district grievance committees or had been returned by the district grievance committees within the past 30 days. The OOC had made its recommendation in 238 of the pending cases and the cases were ready for the Grievance Committee’s decision. Of the remaining 761 files in which no recommendation has yet been made, 146 were more than six months old. In the first quarter of 2021, 130 files were dismissed by the Grievance chair or by the Grievance chair and a vice chair.

There were no inquiries about lawyer advertising in the first quarter of 2021.

c. Trust Account Compliance Program

Sixty-nine lawyers have completed the TAC Program since its inception. Three lawyers accepted offers to participate in the TAC Program after the January 2021 Quarterly Meeting. The Bar currently supervises forty participants, and monitors six DHC defendants whose stayed suspensions include trust account compliance conditions and oversees compliance with random audit corrections.

d. Authorized Practice

The Authorized Practice Committee opened 13 new files this quarter. There are 16 files on the Committee’s April agenda for consideration.  The OOC continues to work with the Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General’s Office dealing with several out-of-state lawyers and law firms that promote debt adjusting and loan modification schemes. With limited exceptions, debt adjusting is illegal in North Carolina. Numerous marketing firms and lawyers engage in this practice.

e. Client Security Fund Claims/Subrogation Cases

There are 19 claims on the agenda for the Board’s April 15 meeting. There are three lawsuits pending in superior court seeking reimbursement from a disbarred lawyer for payments made by the CSF.

f. Ethics

1231 informal ethics inquiries were responded to by staff during the first and second quarters.


Participant income in 2020 totaled more than $4.7 million, an 8% decrease from the same period in 2019. 2020 participant income received by NC IOLTA has decreased as a result of the economic conditions brought on by the pandemic. However, the decrease is less drastic than originally anticipated.

Thank you for the opportunity to represent you in the Bar Council, and please let me know if you have any questions or concerns I can help you on.

Sincerely, Anna Hamrick

Pro Bono Celebration Honors Local Volunteers

The Buncombe County Bar will hold its annual Pro Bono Celebration on Wed, May 12th at 12:30pm on Zoom. At this event we will share the impact of our Bar’s pro bono contributions during the pandemic and recognize and appreciate the hundreds of attorneys in our community that share their time and expertise to help our neighbors meet their most basic needs – housing, safety from abuse, income, health care and more. This year the Bar will give pro bono awards to the following attorneys:

Lifetime Pro Bono Service Award – Bill Christy
Outstanding Pro Bono Service Award – Jean Lee
Emeritus Lawyer Pro Bono Award – Julie Northup and Vann Vogel
Younger Lawyer Pro Bono Award – Barrett McFatter
Collaborative Legal Project Pro Bono Award – Unemployment Insurance Benefit Project

We will also recognize attorneys who have retired this year or will retire in 2021 who have handled 50 or more pro bono cases in our community over the course of their career.

Please join us to celebrate our bar’s generosity and compassion in making a difference in Buncombe County and Western North Carolin

Register at this link.  After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.

Governor Cooper Appoints Jacqueline Grant as Superior Court Judge

Governor Roy Cooper has announced the appointment of Jacqueline Grant as Superior Court Judge in Judicial District 28 serving Buncombe County. Grant will fill the vacant seat created by the retirement of the Honorable Marvin Pope. Grant is a Partner at Roberts & Stevens, P.A. in Asheville. Previously, she served as the President of the North Carolina Bar Association and President of the Buncombe County Bar. Grant earned her Bachelor of Science at Western Carolina University and her Juris Doctor at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Law.

Free One-Hour CLE on Cryptocurrency

Join us on Friday, April 23rd, for a one-hour virtual CLE program that provides an overview of the characteristics of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency and how it can affect law firms representing clients who may own virtual currency.  Topics of discussion include: the characteristics of cryptocurrency, how cryptocurrency can be used for illegal and legal purposes, how cryptocurrency is traced through the blockchain, the methods used to story cryptocurrency, the implications of cryptocurrency in litigation, and action steps to take as legal counsel. Our presenter is Robert Norlander, retired IRS Criminal Invesigator. To learn more, or reserve your spot, click here.